Isolesizwe High School

Get the app
Voting district 43413814: IFP 45.2% (PR ballot)Voting district 43413926: IFP 62.4% (PR ballot)Voting district 43413959: IFP 55.6% (PR ballot)Voting district 43416109: ANC 36.3% (PR ballot)Voting district 43416165: IFP 45.2% (PR ballot)Voting district 43418134: IFP 31.6% (PR ballot)Bhekimpilo Lower Primary School (VD 43413814)Khulubone Primary School (VD 43413926)Kwamtholo Combined Primary School (VD 43413959)Ntandabantu Primary School (VD 43416109)Duma Primary School (VD 43416165)Isolesizwe High School (VD 43418134)
Voting districtsIFP 5ANC 1darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

SIP 40.8%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout45.3%
Voters on the roll1 097
South Africa · Counting23 694 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)
checked Latest results

Voting station

Isolesizwe High SchoolMvuntshini Area Gwabalanda Mpukunyoni TribalGwabalanda, Mpukunyoni Tribal

Ward ballot ? · 493 valid votes

ESP areas in this voting district · 3 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 497 · spoilt 3 · special votes 32 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (497 of 1 097). The IEC publishes 45.4%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 156 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (433); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (236); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Inkosi uMtubatuba's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 15:04 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it