Inkosi uMtubatuba

special votes 4 891 · All 93 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 93 voting districts here (62 941 of 112 457). The IEC publishes 56.1%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same municipality, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 970 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2759); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1410); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 445 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1397); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 337 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1039); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 331 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1006); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 62 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1062 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3212); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 674 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2088); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 566 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1729); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 452 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1342); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 159 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (453); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (105); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (98); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (30); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1348 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3790); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 968 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2992); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 525 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1710); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 39 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (123); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 923 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2655); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 342 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 336 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (974); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 148 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (110); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (58); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1888 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5283); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 823 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2699); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 383 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (144); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (68); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 618 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1910); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1790); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 432 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1278); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 192 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (426); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 48 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (148); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 44 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (125); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (57); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 720 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 551 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1750); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1011); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (576); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 179 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (544); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 157 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (475); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (114); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (96); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 733 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2359); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 689 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2315); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 163 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (468); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 125 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (372); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 76 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (253); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 66 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (185); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 51 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (175); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1170 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3777); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1187); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (616); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (86); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1279 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3957); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 715 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2020); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 633 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1894); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 91 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (271); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (138); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (97); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 758 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2341); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 724 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2336); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 422 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1202); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (540); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (136); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (132); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 34 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (120); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (88); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 993 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3052); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 576 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 249 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (735); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 198 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (534); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 182 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (474); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 28 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 993 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2875); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 976 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2902); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 495 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1520); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 267 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (814); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (155); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 876 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2588); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 854 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2779); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 548 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1699); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 475 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1301); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (107); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (34); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1250 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3785); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 966 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2760); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 467 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1460); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (124); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (89); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (87); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (42); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3679); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 489 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1488); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 365 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 316 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (822); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 53 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (164); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (116); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (64); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (99); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 16: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 992 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2938); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 824 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2430); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 689 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2156); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (49); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (52); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 17: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1400 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4311); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 743 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2230); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 256 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (494); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 135 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (515); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (112); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (56); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (33); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 18: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1284 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3907); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 703 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1911); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 488 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1521); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 315 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1063); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 30 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (72); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 23 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (37); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 19: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1228 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3901); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 983 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2887); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 832 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2545); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 305 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (738); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 71 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (219); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 35 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (109); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (55); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (20); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (27); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 20: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 858 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2809); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 435 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1569); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 216 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (803); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 81 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (308); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (143); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (121); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (95); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (90); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (47); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (61); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (53); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 1781: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 21: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 860 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2630); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 755 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2358); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 375 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1150); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 303 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (795); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 120 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (367); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (162); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (151); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 43 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (115); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 41 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (77); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 22: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1071 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3211); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 653 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1944); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 265 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 164 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (496); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (36); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 23: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 07 Nov 2026, 07:23 SAST.