Emchakwini High School

Get the app
Voting district 43414264: IFP 40.6% (PR ballot)Voting district 43417841: IFP 56.5% (PR ballot)Voting district 43418336: IFP 47.6% (PR ballot)Voting district 43414253: IFP 41.1% (PR ballot)Emchakwini High School (VD 43414253)Nsabalele Primary School (VD 43414264)Thango Primary School (VD 43417841)Endombeni Primary School (VD 43418336)
Voting districtsIFP 4darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

IFP 40.8%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout60.6%
Voters on the roll2 578
South Africa · Counting23 694 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)
checked Latest results

Voting station

Emchakwini High SchoolMfekayi Emchakwini Area MtubatubaEmchakwini Area, Mtubatuba

Ward ballot ? · 1 553 valid votes

ESP areas in this voting district · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 1 561 · spoilt 16 · special votes 164 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (1 561 of 2 578). The IEC publishes 60.8%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 635 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1909); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 318 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1008); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 333 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (976); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 167 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (479); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (51); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (43); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Inkosi uMtubatuba's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 01:57 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it