Voting districtsIFP 3darker = bigger win

Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

IFP 48.2%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout55.8%

Voters on the roll1 592

South Africa · Counting23 694 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)

checked 01:42Latest results

Voting station

Siyaqala High SchoolP484 Kwahohhohho Area Mtubatuba Mpukunyoni TribalMtubatuba, Mpukunyoni Tribal

Ward ballot ? · 875 valid votes

IFPInkatha Freedom Party42248.2%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party26229.9%
IndependentIndependent candidates9410.7%
ANCAfrican National Congress586.6%
DADemocratic Alliance80.9%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party60.7%
NFPNational Freedom Party50.6%
I.L.PIzwe Lethu Party50.6%
NACOLNational Community Liberation40.5%
AICAfrican Independent Congress20.2%
UDMUnited Democratic Movement10.1%
SACPSouth African Communist Party10.1%
KZNIKzn Independence10.1%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters10.1%
PAPatriotic Alliance10.1%
NPANational Peoples Ambassadors10.1%
AMC.ROY.African Movement Congress10.1%
JCJozini Congress10.1%
GJDPGods Justice and Development Party10.1%

ESP areas in this voting district · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 889 · spoilt 15 · special votes 67 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (889 of 1 592). The IEC publishes 55.8%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 479 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1378); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 278 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (820); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 0: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 69 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 10 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1472: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1745: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 660: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2169: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1030: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1872: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 6: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2027: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2073: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Inkosi uMtubatuba's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:24 SAST.