Matlhare Mokautu High School

Get the app
Voting district 86991610: ANC 46.2% (PR ballot)Voting district 86991744: ANC 53.8% (PR ballot)Voting district 86992307: SLK26 64.4% (PR ballot)Voting district 86992622: SLK26 53.8% (PR ballot)Voting district 87070024: SLK26 50.3% (PR ballot)Voting district 87070035: SLK26 48.9% (PR ballot)Voting district 87070013: ANC 45.9% (PR ballot)Morogong Primary School (VD 86991610)Maile Primary School (VD 86991744)Tshekami Middle School (VD 86992307)Kitso Early Learning Centre (VD 86992622)Matlhare Mokautu High School (VD 87070013)Monakato Primary School (VD 87070024)United Reformed Church (VD 87070035)
Voting districtsSLK26 4ANC 3darker = bigger win
Dots: voting stations
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

ANC 45.9%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout62.8%
Voters on the roll2 719
South Africa · Counting23 694 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)
checked Latest results

Voting station

Matlhare Mokautu High School1254 Monakato Ext1 Rietspruit RustenburgRietspruit, Rustenburg

Ward ballot ? · 1 696 valid votes

ESP areas in this voting district · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 1 707 · spoilt 0 · special votes 604 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (1 707 of 2 719). The IEC publishes 62.8%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 783 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2357); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3223: the IEC's cross-ballot total 713 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 47 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (119); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (92); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 25 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (71); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (45); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 17: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1065: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2002: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1951: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Rustenburg's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 09 Nov 2026, 05:28 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it