Voting districtsANC 3DA 1darker = bigger win

Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

ANC 38.5%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout45.9%

Voters on the roll1 554

South Africa · Counting23 692 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)

checked 16:49Latest results

Voting station

Ng Kerk MmaditlhokoaPortion 301 342jq Kafferskraal Farm Mmaditlhokoa, Marikana RustenburgMmaditlhokoa, Marikana, Rustenburg

Ward ballot ? · 761 valid votes

ANCAfrican National Congress29338.5%
PURPLEPurple Party Ikageng22529.6%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters10814.2%
PAPatriotic Alliance557.2%
DADemocratic Alliance172.2%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party152.0%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa101.3%
SACPSouth African Communist Party60.8%
ActionSA60.8%
AACUMActive African Christians United Movement50.7%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement40.5%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus20.3%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party20.3%
TSOGANGTsogang Civic Movement20.3%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement20.3%
ALJAMAAl Jama-ah10.1%
APCAfrican People's Convention10.1%
COPECongress of the People10.1%
SAPASouth African Political Association10.1%
ECOFORUMEconomic Emancipation Forum10.1%
AEFAfrican Economic Freedom10.1%
RPPRustenburg People's Party10.1%
FISAFreedom in South Africa10.1%
SDPService Delivery Party10.1%

ESP areas in this voting district · 1 ?

Rustenburg Platinum Mine

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 713 · spoilt 7 · special votes 134 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (713 of 1 554). The IEC publishes 50.1%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 290 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (874); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 225 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (663); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (328); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (104); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 19 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (54); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (46); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1738: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 958: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 447: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this voting district is 50.13%; its own counts give 45.88% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Rustenburg's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:14 SAST.