Voting districtsANC 2LABOUR 1darker = bigger win

Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

LABOUR 57.7%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout35.3%

Voters on the roll2 034

South Africa · Counting23 692 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)

checked 16:45Latest results

Voting station

Karee Mine HallKaree Mine Hostel Karee RustenburgKaree, Rustenburg

Ward ballot ? · 747 valid votes

LABOURLabour Party of South Africa43157.7%
ANCAfrican National Congress11415.3%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters7510.0%
MKPUmkhonto Wesizwe Party557.4%
DADemocratic Alliance354.7%
SACPSouth African Communist Party81.1%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus60.8%
TSOGANGTsogang Civic Movement50.7%
ActionSA50.7%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement50.7%
APCAfrican People's Convention20.3%
UCDPUnited Christian Democratic Party10.1%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party10.1%
ECOFORUMEconomic Emancipation Forum10.1%
AACUMActive African Christians United Movement10.1%
AEFAfrican Economic Freedom10.1%
PURPLEPurple Party Ikageng10.1%

ESP areas in this voting district · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 719 · spoilt 12 · special votes 14 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (719 of 2 034). The IEC publishes 37.8%.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 423 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (854); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 107 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (356); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (240); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 58 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (194); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 36 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (129); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (22); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1493: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1693: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1260: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1888: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1294: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2152: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2052: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 999: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1817: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1541: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1863: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: the IEC's published turnout for this voting district is 37.76%; its own counts give 35.35% (PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters); we show the calculated figure.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Rustenburg's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 15:17 SAST.