Voting districtsANC 2DA 1darker = bigger win

Dots: voting stations

Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

200020062011201620212026

DA 28.4%

Most ward votes

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Turnout50.9%

Voters on the roll2 536

South Africa · Counting23 694 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)

checked 20:31Latest results

Voting station

Nanabolela Secondary School18122 Kotelo Street Thabong WelkomThabong, Welkom

Ward ballot ? · 1 126 valid votes

DADemocratic Alliance32028.4%
ANCAfrican National Congress31828.2%
EFFEconomic Freedom Fighters28725.5%
VFCVoice for Change454.0%
PAPatriotic Alliance332.9%
SACPSouth African Communist Party322.8%
ACTAfrican Congress for Transformation262.3%
ActionSA201.8%
VF PLUSVryheidsfront Plus | Freedom Front Plus90.8%
MAYIBUYEAfrika Mayibuye Movement90.8%
ACDPAfrican Christian Democratic Party40.4%
APCAfrican People's Convention40.4%
ATMAfrican Transformation Movement40.4%
IFPInkatha Freedom Party30.3%
PACPan Africanist Congress of Azania30.3%
COPECongress of the People20.2%
AACAfrican Alliance Congress20.2%
LABOURLabour Party of South Africa20.2%
URFUnited Residents Front10.1%
FISAFreedom in South Africa10.1%
ALMAfrican Liberation Movement10.1%

ESP areas in this voting district · 2 ?

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

Votes cast 1 291 · spoilt 64 · special votes 144 · All 1 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters in this voting district (1 291 of 2 536). The IEC publishes 50.9%.

The change beside the headline is the difference between the leading party's share here and its share in the 2021 election for the same voting district, both from the IEC's counts, with no votes re-allocated between boundaries.

Note: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 355 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1035); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 325 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (962); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 292 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (868); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2072: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (149); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 27 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (60); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (93); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1740: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (79); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1511: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (66); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 18: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 450: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 8: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1047: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (31); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 499: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1802: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 568: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 2011: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1751: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1707: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1749: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1775: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

The DC 40% ? ballot is published per municipality: Matjhabeng's DC 40% result.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

The voting station is from the IEC's voting station list for the 2026 elections.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 13:40 SAST.