Dr. Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma

Get the app
Ward 1: ANC 47.1%Ward 2: MKP 36.9%Ward 3: DA 41.3%Ward 4: ANC 37.3%Ward 5: ANC 40.3%Ward 6: IFP 31.9%Ward 7: ANC 46.7%Ward 8: MKP 37.1%Ward 9: MKP 46.8%Ward 10: MKP 52.3%Ward 11: MKP 49.0%Ward 12: MKP 44.2%Ward 13: MKP 51.0%Ward 14: ANC 41.2%Ward 15: MKP 52.0%
WardsMKP 8ANC 5DA 1IFP 1darker = bigger win
Election yearDrag or tap a yearDrag the handle or click a year · ← → keys work too

No majority

MKP 12 of 29 seats · 15 for a majority

Most ward votes: MKP 39.5%

Stations open 7am–9pm · results from 9pm · SourceSpecial votes 2 and 3 Nov, 8am–5pm.

Dr. Nkosazana Dlamini ZumaAll 88 voting districts in
All 15 wards complete
Turnout57.2%
Voters on the roll61 948
South Africa · Counting23 690 of 23 696 voting districts in (100.0%)
checked Latest results

Ward ballot ? · 34 792 valid votes

Council seats · 29 ?

  1. Umkhonto Wesizwe Party8 ward · 4 PR12
  2. African National Congress5 ward · 6 PR11
  3. Inkatha Freedom Party1 ward · 2 PR3
  4. Democratic Alliance1 ward · 1 PR2
  5. Economic Freedom Fighters0 ward · 1 PR1

Hours off in Dr. Nkosazana Dlamini Zuma ?

Reported in the ESP app

Power109hours off12 outages
Water0hours offNo outages
Internet0hours offNo outages
May · Power: 14 hours offMay: 14 hours off14MayJun: 0 hours off0JunJul: 0 hours off0JulAug: 0 hours off0AugSep · Power: 62 hours offSep: 62 hours off62SepOct · Power: 33 hours offOct: 33 hours off33Oct

Wards · 15

On EskomSePush

About these figures

Notes on the IEC's figures for this page

special votes 1 896 · All 88 voting districts in (the IEC's voting-district results so far, out of its list of voting districts for this election)

In local elections the IEC adds votes across the ward, PR and district ballots, so we show valid votes per ballot instead of one "votes cast" total.

Turnout is calculated as PR ballots cast ÷ registered voters, from the IEC's results for the 88 voting districts here (35 462 of 61 948). The IEC publishes 57.3%.

Note: ward 1: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1028 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3014); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 853 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2627); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 202 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (153); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 29 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (38); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (48); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 1: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 758 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2294); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 660 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1952); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 533 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1574); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 61 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (174); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (40); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 2: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 821 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2445); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 584 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1753); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 517 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1609); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 31 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 16 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (63); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 3: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 931 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2803); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 749 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2246); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 436 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1299); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 152 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (471); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 127 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (344); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 77 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (201); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 17 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (39); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 8 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 4: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 948 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2853); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 758 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2223); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 434 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1327); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 165 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (490); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 24 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (80); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 20 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (50); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 5: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 945 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2833); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 929 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2821); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 867 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2573); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 185 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (536); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 22 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (44); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (35); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 6: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1074 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3172); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 965 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2970); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 158 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (476); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 52 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (147); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 26 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (85); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 13 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 7 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (25); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 7: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 890 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2696); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 730 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2160); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 645 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1899); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (161); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 54 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (181); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 15 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (24); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (29); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (18); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 8: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1102 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3395); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 599 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1787); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 313 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (916); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 220 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (637); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 80 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (234); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 21 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (70); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (23); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 9 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (16); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 9: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1123 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3419); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 760 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2218); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 138 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (390); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 56 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (154); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 50 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (158); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 3 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 10: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1141 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3482); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 881 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2606); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 136 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (379); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 114 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (319); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 45 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (128); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (19); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (11); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (15); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 11: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1064 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3217); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1038 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3100); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 212 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (635); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 42 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (111); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 33 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (94); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 11 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (26); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (21); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (13); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (10); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 12: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1027 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3074); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 701 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2127); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 124 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (329); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 85 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (254); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 55 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (167); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 12 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (32); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (12); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 4 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 2 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (6); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 13: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 942 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2799); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 804 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2440); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 300 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (886); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 171 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (520); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 32 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (102); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 18 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (41); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 14 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (28); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (8); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 14: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (9); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1748: the IEC's cross-ballot total 1307 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (3972); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 7: the IEC's cross-ballot total 954 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2811); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 52: the IEC's cross-ballot total 131 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (377); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 3: the IEC's cross-ballot total 60 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (173); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 945: the IEC's cross-ballot total 49 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (142); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 445: the IEC's cross-ballot total 6 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (17); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1909: the IEC's cross-ballot total 5 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1720: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (4); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 330: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (14); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1305: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1318: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (5); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 591: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (1); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 957: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 1765: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (2); we show each ballot's own votes.

Note: ward 15: party 4: the IEC's cross-ballot total 0 differs from its ward + PR + DC 40% votes (7); we show each ballot's own votes.

Percentages are calculated from the IEC's vote counts. Official results: results.elections.org.za.

Map boundaries: Municipal Demarcation Board (MDB) and the IEC.

IEC data last fetched 06 Nov 2026, 11:07 SAST.

Get the ESP App

Ask people in your area how long the queue is.

Outages, alerts and community updates for your area.

  1. 1Install the app
  2. 2Save your area to get alerts
Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play
Already have the app? Open it